Does the initiative lie with the enforcer or with the refusenik?
Vlad the Impaler didn't impale people who said yes to him, but the people who said no at the least didn't end up as slaves. And who knows, impalement might be a better option than slavery.
Dogs are smart without a doubt. A dog puts its nose in an ants’ nest and withdraws pretty bloody quick. Why is that I wonder? Could it be because every ant in that anthill will bite and tell the dog to back off? And when the dog backs away it is signalling that it has no real hope of compliance from the ants, the ants will do what ants do, they will bite back. They might even bite back better.
In this case who holds the initiative, the dog or the ants? Even a Davosian idiot might concede that it would be the ants. (But even if the idiot doesn’t, it’s still the ants.) So what are these same Davosian halfwits missing when they try to coerce all of us ants to do as we are told by their dogs? By how many do we outnumber them? By how many of us will they be bitten before they back off?
Some of the Davosians are frank in their view of us as ants. And as ants we can bite if we choose to do so, and the most effective bite of all from the point of view of our self-appointed betters is their fear that we will refuse their orders. It’s not a given yet that all of us will refuse, but a significant proportion are already doing so. Davos and its hangers-on appear to be dogs of little brain.
No disrespect to dogs, which I mostly like, but great disrespect to the hybrid dog poking around our ant nest, a dog formed from a bunch of spoilt, over resourced, under-brained brats who are clinging to some weird plan initiated by a group of their unethical (but smarter) ancestors. The smarter ancestors might indeed have backed off by now, recognising defeat, retiring to try again another day. The spoilt brats we face today are too stupid to do anything beyond trudging on in the tracks laid for them centuries ago. No intelligence, no awareness, no real survival skills. Perhaps their stupidity is a good thing after all, it makes them easier to deal with come the reckoning, and the reckoning is coming. These people wanted an ant farm but have mishandled the deal and instead seem to have a wave of ants ready to bite. And this time round they are not coming back better, they have made too many waves for a renaissance to be possible.
The spoilt-bratocracy are in the process of blowing grand-daddy’s plan because they have no idea how to execute it beyond force backed by the corruption and money willed to them by their smarter forebears. When that doesn’t work their only recourse is the application of yet more force using increasingly ludicrous grounds and excuses. Look at the list they themselves reveal, world war 1, recessions, world war 2, global cooling, global warming, drugs, terrorism, convid, terrorism yet again, bringing the world democracy (as if the world actually asked for the model), more war - this time in Ukraine, next in the middle east, transgenderism, wokism of a multitude of varieties, more diseases for us all to cower before, domestic terrorism for us to either cower before or be arrested for, thought crime, - the list is open ended - add any other. We are pretty much at the point where the question is does 2 + 2 = 4 or 5? Think carefully because we, the spoilt-bratocracy define the answers, you the peons just answer as told and do as told and die as told. And in this case peons the answer is 5.
When someone suggests that we do something, when they ask us to do something, when they demand that we do something, when they order us to do something, when they decide to try to coerce us into doing something, when they try to force us to do something which we know to be ridiculous, their demands are only as effective as our level of compliance permits.
If we say no they are done. They may cause damage on the way down, but they are going down, backing away like the dog backs away from the ants’ nest. If it stays too long it will be bitten to death, that’s why it leaves. And the spoilt-bratocracy is staying way too long. Seems like it is determined to be bitten to death. They might not taste good but we shouldn’t hesitate to help out.
The initiative is ours, the initiative rests always with the person who has something that the bully wants and is trying to extract. What after all is the purpose of bullies, their reason to exist, their reason to keep bullying? Their intent is to make someone say no who would otherwise say yes, or yes who would otherwise say no. It’s coercion for the sake of coercion. Bullies need power, they only feel good when exercising power over others, and the timeless way of backing bullies off is to stand against them, say no where they need a yes, say yes where they need a no. If we know what the bullies want we can take the initiative from them by refusing their offer, by saying no when they want us to say yes.
Bullies and their empires work only until the people the empire regards as its subjects begin to laugh at the stupidity of the situation, then the system starts to fall apart. When people move on to saying “hell no” is the moment that things become dangerous for the pushers of empire and the pushers of nonsensical measures no one but them sees as having any value. We are currently in a “hell no!” moment and have been for a lot longer than most of us might have noticed.
When the spoilt-bratocracy begins to stamp its tiny feet in its designer shoes, it reveals its own panicked acknowledgement that the initiative rests in our accord, not in their demands. They have been spoilt brats all their lives, getting what they wanted whenever they wanted because of the wealth and influence they have been gifted, but when stamping the stylishly shod foot doesn’t work, and when threats to pull the whole world down if they don’t get what they want, however mad, are the only way out for these clowns, then what?
That’s the point we are reaching, the point when the cost of acceding to the demands of these clowns is too devastating to us and to our children and their children for us to be bothering with this nonsense. At this point the only mature response to murderous medical treatments, net-zero bullshit, 24/7 surveillance, and all the other aspects of the restricted and coercive life on offer from our ass-hole how-high politicians and their hidden paymasters is “no thank-you, offer declined.”
It is an answer within our own gift, and it is our realisation of the gift we hold, every one of us in our hands, which if they had any sense would make the spoilt-bratocracy lie awake at night, make them shiver in their miserable crocodile skin shoes, and cause them to sulk and suffer temper tantrums. Let’s fuel the tantrums and wave these pricks goodbye.
Here is a quote from Peter Koenig in his recent article : “The WEF Davos 2024 Circus: Their One Objective is ‘Massively To Reduce World Population.’ ”
In his article Mr Koenig comments upon the WEF’s stated ambition/intention of reducing the world population by billions through a transition through which warm blooded, breathing people either become cold blooded non breathing cadavers, or simply never exist at all. That’s not just you, it’s your children and their children and so on – most of whom won’t exist if these ass-holes get their way.
So Mr Koenig is talking in the context of an artificially limited world population, a limit which would make it easier for the spoilt-bratocracy to control those who are still here, and to loot resources which they appear to believe are limited but should belong to them to help them solve the problem of making themselves into gods. Mad? Yep, and who asked these clowns to have an opinion anyway, I certainly didn’t, did you? Yet these are the clowns to whom you are giving a pass if you keep saying yes to their lunatic proposals. And in that context Mr Koenig says :
“….such a limited world population would lend itself best for a One World Order with a One World Government, and a One Health World, the latter dictated and tyrannized by the World Health Organization.
The World Health Organization (WHO) tyranny – a dream of the WEF and its cult cabal – may only happen if the infamous PANDEMIC TREATY and the amply modified INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS are approved at the WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY in May 2024.
To avoid this fraud people around the world must now call upon their governments – in whatever strongest ways they can – to exit the WHO Now. Period.”
Sounds like a plan. Consider how we, our parents and our grandparents have been fooled, and go back as far as you like, hundreds of years of deception, manipulation and control by the moneyed, by the ass-holes who have coagulated as a sort of unpleasant crust upon humanity, compressing and controlling through pressure.
When I was a child my parents and many around them would grumble about how “something should be done about this …”, “they should sort this out…”, “when are they going to do something about that awful Mr Stalin?” and so on. Always an unspecified and all powerful they, never an unruly and angry populace saying “… this isn’t good enough, we’ll sort it out,” a la french revolution. And today’s they-sayers, the ones who in the recent unpleasantness ran to the police if you had too many people in your garden, if you didn’t wear a mask, or if you didn’t think the Russians were devils incarnate, are busy once more, genuflecting to the brat-ocracy, following narratives which make no sense unless you are the WHO, the WEF or some other form of fellow traveller..
There’s always a they, always someone higher up some illusory chain who will have a solution, our own organic solutions are surplus to requirement, largely because they might be based in reality rather than ideology. Our solutions are not required because the solution is evident from the orders issued to us through censorship, and a general state of what James Kunstler aptly refers to as mindfuckery. We no longer need to think that “they should do something about x, y or z” because they are already doing it and all we need is to get in line, get with the programme, no need to think for ourselves (what a relief) the thinking has already been done.
Where our parents and grandparents were after a fashion looking for solutions from ‘Them’, we don’t need to, the solutions are already here and all we need to do is as we are told.
But what if there were to be a glitch in the programme, a hiccup, and suddenly some of us said no, that makes no sense, not doing it? Who holds the initiative then? Well that would be us.
Looking at the ineptitude of the spoilt-bratocracy we are likely to see that they decide that even the 500,000,000 which they seem to regard as the optimum population of the world to suit their comfort and preferences is still too many for their idiocy to control. Their evil ancestors are rolling in their graves no doubt to see the cretins they have spawned fritter away their anticipated victory.
Not many of the 8 - or is it 9 billion - currently here are actually seeing these freaks for what they are, but even with the relatively small proportion seeing through the con these people are having trouble getting their own way. So I would suggest it’s not looking good for the half-billion these people think is about right as a number, to hell with the individual eight and a half billion tragedies that implies. I doubt this current crop of ass-holes will consider that they can actually control even one thinking person, let alone half a billion.
They will conclude no doubt that no people other than themselves are required on the planet, or on the flat earth or whatever they happen to believe, and suddenly these clowns will find themselves having to iron their own shoe laces, put their careful inch of toothpaste on their own toothbrushes and so on, until they run out of toothbrushes and shoe-laces and a few other items because there is no-one left to make replacements. And once all the useful, productive men and women are gone as per the plan perhaps they will try hard to enjoy bossing each other around until they run out of their stocks of the food and resources produced by us billions.
How about saving them from that awful fate by refusing to be disappeared?
The initiative rests with us because the options appear to be:
- exist or don’t exist at the whim of a bunch of spoilt brat lunatics, or
- say thank you for the option but no thank you. You guys first if you want to reduce numbers, feel free to step off the planet, or off the edge of the world if you prefer the other model.
We have the initiative, we have the answer.
It’s short,
it’s catchy,
it’s no.
There are plenty of initiatives being taken by “our” governments, by “our” weird self-appointed international organisations, by “our” local councils, each of them a front for a long plan funded by money stolen through the fraudulent financial system. Let’s take as an example the WHO - self styled World Health Organisation. What does that even mean? At the moment they are working to establish up some sort of world dictatorship through a health regime which means, apparently, that all they would need to do would be to declare an emergency and everyone would do as they say. A shake of the head is all it takes, slow hand-clap for these fuck-wits. Even slower hand-clap for the “national” politicians who seem prepared to sign countries up to these idiocies. They might sign, same as they might declare wars.
The answer for politicians is very simple.
On declaring war : “Here is your air ticket (economy) and here is your gun. You will get the ammunition at the other end because you are too stupid not to shoot yourself in the foot on the aeroplane. Now off you go and have your war. Not expecting to see you back so its just a one way ticket.”
On handing our health to some low level brigand from Ethiopia : “Help yourself pal, jab yourself to death, but I didn’t sign anything and I’m not doing whatever fuck-wittery you have in mind. Let’s not chat on the other side.”
Saying no is your god given right, and if you don’t think god has any say then it is simply your given right by natural law. The initiative rests with you. You can say yes - you can say no. What can they do beyond kill you? If you don’t let these ass-holes into your mind they have no control over you. And that drives them wild, that makes them stamp their neatly shod little feet in frustration. As Catherine Austin Fitts says from time to time, there are things worse than death. Allowing yourself to be enslaved, treated with some poison or other as a ‘cure’ for a non existent disease, or killed outright by a fucking idiot are a few of those things.
And if I may suggest, don’t be looking to the classics or philosophers for succour. They all had things to say about the estate of man, about the human condition, but they are all dead. They can’t help you now. Now it is up to you, stoic or not, panic merchant or not, platonist or whoever. They are dead, you are not. You can use their writings and their thoughts as the basis for further thought, you can use them as the basis for a philosophical view of life and what it means, but you can’t use them as a substitute for your own, unruly, original thought, for your own perspective.
If you don’t have a unique perspective you are not unique, if you are unable to think for yourself you are a blank canvas. Good luck with that. Good luck with that in your next incarnation, next time around. Whatever you do now is for you not for some ideal or idea. By all means bear them in mind, bear their ideas in mind as inspiration, but recognise that you survive or fail to survive on your own efforts. There is no cavalry riding to your rescue. Its up to you, its up to each one of us. We survive on our determination to survive, on our acceptance of our own responsibility. If any of us fail, we die as slaves. If we succeed we die as free men and free women. At the moment, at any moment, the latter is a good option.
Nine billion “Hell no!”s is a lot of initiative, and now’s the moment to express that initiative.
Catching up on some of my essential reading after a very lethargic period. Brilliant as always mate. As we plough on, I feel more and more, your solution is the only one, both philosophically, and practically speaking - NO. Speaking of philosophy - well said on this part: "don’t be looking to the classics or philosophers for succour". I have an ex colleague with whom I carried on a tiresome debate for some time before he either got bored with it or decided I was too much of a dangerous radical to be associated with - but he was always invoking Plato and those other long dead kiddie-fiddlers. I found it so trite and pompous. He would refuse to acknowledge any of the anti-establishment luminaries of our time, and continually hark back to the ancient pontifications of the Greeks. In the end I decided it was just his way of avoiding an honest debate, while also trying to laud it over me intellectually.
Keep up the good fight mate.